[Shootout-list] Updates for Haskell benchmarks.

[Isaac Gouy]

--- JP Bernardy <jyp_7@yahoo.com> wrote:
-snip- 

> If at all possible, this requires resorting to ugly
> code. Therefore, I suggest to change the benchamrk
> specifications so that the "number of times to perform
> the action" is reflected in one way or another in the
> output.

Tests like Sieve are "same way" (which begs the question "same as
what?" - in the original presumably the same as C).

"Since the purpose of the same way tests is to try to compare, side by
side, the same kind of operation in one language as in another, they
often use code that is naive and unidiomatic by design."

My ignorance of Haskell is profound, but shouldn't a Haskell
implementation of Sieve use Haskell arrays?

http://www.zvon.org/other/haskell/Outputarray/array_f.html




	
		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail