[Shootout-list] Re: ring of processes

Isaac Gouy igouy2@yahoo.com
Mon, 8 Nov 2004 08:35:30 -0800 (PST)


> > If it was a severe deficiencey you would have noticed it for
> > yourself by now :-)
> 
> unfortunatly the deficiency with the shootout has been hidden by the 
> fact that all the criticism has been directed towards my test design 
> (for procinst and ringmsg).
> if somebody had mentioned that it was not the test design that was
> the problem, but how the shootout handled the variable n, i would
> probably have noticed the deficiency a little faster.

Bengt - it's not about you.

> now, the questions i asked where these:
> why is only the largest n used?
> why can this not be changed?

Please explain why you think this is "a severe deficiency with the
shootout". 



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. 
www.yahoo.com