[Shootout-list] Re: ring of processes
Isaac Gouy
igouy2@yahoo.com
Mon, 8 Nov 2004 08:35:30 -0800 (PST)
> > If it was a severe deficiencey you would have noticed it for
> > yourself by now :-)
>
> unfortunatly the deficiency with the shootout has been hidden by the
> fact that all the criticism has been directed towards my test design
> (for procinst and ringmsg).
> if somebody had mentioned that it was not the test design that was
> the problem, but how the shootout handled the variable n, i would
> probably have noticed the deficiency a little faster.
Bengt - it's not about you.
> now, the questions i asked where these:
> why is only the largest n used?
> why can this not be changed?
Please explain why you think this is "a severe deficiency with the
shootout".
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page.
www.yahoo.com