[Shootout-list] Two notes: Pascal and CMUCL

[Kero-Chan]

On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 13:03:56 +0200, Bengt Kleberg
<bengt.kleberg@ericsson.com> wrote:
> > Possible values could be:
> >  * Interpreted
> >  * JIT (Compiled to byte-code at startup, which is then interpreted, ie: Psyco)
> >  * Incremental JIT (Compiled to byte-code as executed, which is then
> > interpreted, ie: Python)
> >  * Byte-code (Compiled to byte-code, which can be executed later, ie:
> > Java's .jar)
> >  * Stand-alone byte-code (Byte-code with the binary runtime inlined,
> > ie: OCaml's ocamlc -custom)
> >  * Compiled (To native code which needs a run-time, ie: CMUCL)
> >  * Stand-alone (ie: OCaml's ocamlopt)
> 
> good list. i think you have defined all the variants i know of.
> 
> i also think (but i could be wrong) that most other people use jit to
> mean that we have something (often byte code) that is compiled to native
> when used. are you sure that the normal usage is the same as the one you
> define her?
> 
> 
> bengt

You are right:
http://wombat.doc.ic.ac.uk/foldoc/foldoc.cgi?query=jit&action=Search