[Shootout-list] Two notes: Pascal and CMUCL
Bengt Kleberg
bengt.kleberg@ericsson.com
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 11:39:25 +0200
Kero-Chan wrote:
...deleted
>>>Possible values could be:
>>> * Interpreted
>>> * JIT (Compiled to byte-code at startup, which is then interpreted, ie: Psyco)
>>> * Incremental JIT (Compiled to byte-code as executed, which is then
>>>interpreted, ie: Python)
>>> * Byte-code (Compiled to byte-code, which can be executed later, ie:
>>>Java's .jar)
>>> * Stand-alone byte-code (Byte-code with the binary runtime inlined,
>>>ie: OCaml's ocamlc -custom)
>>> * Compiled (To native code which needs a run-time, ie: CMUCL)
>>> * Stand-alone (ie: OCaml's ocamlopt)
to normalise your list with the Free On-line Dictionary of Computing
(http://wombat.doc.ic.ac.uk/foldoc, thank you for the pointer) we could
change the occurance of jit in your list to ''something-else'' (is there
a good name? anybody?)
and add
* JIT (Compiled to native code at startup, ie: java with jit)
* Incremental JIT (Compiled to native code when executed, ie: java with
hot-spot)
please correct my examples if they are no longer correct. and suggest
better ones.
i suggest this is something for the faq. would it be possible to add the
list to it?
bengt