[Shootout-list] Two notes: Pascal and CMUCL

[Bengt Kleberg]

Kero-Chan wrote:

...deleted
>>>Possible values could be:
>>> * Interpreted
>>> * JIT (Compiled to byte-code at startup, which is then interpreted, ie: Psyco)
>>> * Incremental JIT (Compiled to byte-code as executed, which is then
>>>interpreted, ie: Python)
>>> * Byte-code (Compiled to byte-code, which can be executed later, ie:
>>>Java's .jar)
>>> * Stand-alone byte-code (Byte-code with the binary runtime inlined,
>>>ie: OCaml's ocamlc -custom)
>>> * Compiled (To native code which needs a run-time, ie: CMUCL)
>>> * Stand-alone (ie: OCaml's ocamlopt)

to normalise your list with the Free On-line Dictionary of Computing 
(http://wombat.doc.ic.ac.uk/foldoc, thank you for the pointer) we could 
change the occurance of jit in your list to ''something-else'' (is there 
a good name? anybody?)

and add

* JIT (Compiled to native code at startup, ie: java with jit)
* Incremental JIT (Compiled to native code when executed, ie: java with 
hot-spot)

please correct my examples if they are no longer correct. and suggest 
better ones.

i suggest this is something for the faq. would it be possible to add the 
list to it?


bengt