[Shootout-list] Re: Integer overflow
Bengt Kleberg
bengt.kleberg@ericsson.com
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:16:46 +0200
Brent Fulgham wrote:
...deleted
> One possible way would be to provide some kind of
> global state that threads would tend to "share", while
> separate processes would obviously safely protect.
> Perhaps some kind of global variable that each process
> increments. If the variable is protected, it would
as you know, i have thought about this. but, since i think in erlang and
erlang does not have any possiblity of global state, i find it really
difficult to come up with a test.
i am open to suggestions, but personally i am stomped.
bengt