[Shootout-list] Re: Integer overflow

Bengt Kleberg bengt.kleberg@ericsson.com
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:16:46 +0200


Brent Fulgham wrote:
...deleted
> One possible way would be to provide some kind of
> global state that threads would tend to "share", while
> separate processes would obviously safely protect. 
> Perhaps some kind of global variable that each process
> increments.  If the variable is protected, it would

as you know, i have thought about this. but, since i think in erlang and 
erlang does not have any possiblity of global state, i find it really 
difficult to come up with a test.
i am open to suggestions, but personally i am stomped.


bengt