[Shootout-list] haskell lists

[Brent Fulgham]

On 2004-09-29 10:18:15 -0700 Aaron Denney <wnoise@ofb.net> wrote:

> Hi.  I've noticed that the list processing benchmark for Haskell is
> listed as "Test Implemented but not measured (timeout or error)."
> 
> It's also ridiculously inefficient.  I've attached a much faster
> implementation that relies on the "Edison" libraries that come with
> GHC to use lists that can be efficiently manipulated at either end.
> 

Any idea why it believes the correct answer is '4' (for N=4), rather 
than
the expected 10000?

-Brent