[Shootout-list] New test in CVS: implicitode

[Sebastien Loisel]

Okay, can you take another look now, especially at the python code?
The c++ template satanic verses are still the same, but the python
should be readable. If not, tell me where it could be made better.

And I retracted my intervals, they weren't working out (long math
explanation omitted.) Instead, I've added an fl type, which is just a
simulated low precision floating point.

And For the First Time Ever in the World! The python and c++ code are
now outputting exactly the same thing and take an integer parameter to
run longer or shorter. So we could actually add it to the sandbox.

Cheers,

Sebastien Loisel

On Apr 2, 2005 9:28 PM, Sebastien Loisel <sloisel@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, I can do that.
> 
> Some more changes going in:
> 
> * long doubles are out. There are too few languages supporting long
> doubles at this time, any test of this sort should be in a separate
> benchmark.
> * intervals replace long doubles. This is to encourage polymorphic code.
> 
> If you are not template-fluent the python code will soon look a lot
> easier to read than the C++. I will attempt to comment both, so long
> as I'm not criticized for program length! :-)
> 
> Sebastien Loisel
> 
> On Apr 2, 2005 7:08 PM, Simon Geard <simon@whiteowl.co.uk> wrote:
> > I know this is a new test and still in development but would it be
> > possible to comment the code more so that I can see what's going on. The
> > c++ code has no comments and uses its built-in obfuscation feature,
> > templates :-) . Neither of the tests (c++ or python)  are suitable as a
> > reference for doing other language implementations at the moment.
> >
> > Ta,
> >
> > Simon Geard
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Shootout-list mailing list
> > Shootout-list@lists.alioth.debian.org
> > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/shootout-list
> >
>