[Shootout-list] Stuff (wide range of languages)

[Jon Harrop]

On Tuesday 26 April 2005 20:07, Brent Fulgham wrote:
> Provide implementations in:
> 1)  An interpreted langauge, a JIT language, and
>     a compiled language.  This shows the range of
>     performance we can expect (and helps to avoid
>     setting too low a value of 'N' for compiled
>     languages, or too high a value for interpreted
>     languages.

You know OCaml can be interpreted in the top level and there are byte-code, 
JIT and native code compilers?

I think I've satisfied clause (1). ;-)

-- 
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
Objective CAML for Scientists
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists