[Shootout-list] Ray tracer

Jon Harrop jon@ffconsultancy.com
Mon, 20 Jun 2005 00:52:30 +0100


On Sunday 19 June 2005 19:06, Dave wrote:
> Let's forget this damn 100 LOC limit *except as it was originally
> intended* - to be a guideline for new ideas to make it into the sandbox.

Are you happy with the lengths in the ray tracer test (57-471 LOC)?

> Are people taking this stuff way too seriously, or what?
>
> Just keep the implementation rules and suggestions simple - after a program
> is moved out of the sandbox let the implementors submit code reflecting
> what is important to them.

Would you be happy to see new algorithms and data structures used?

> We're all volunteers here - the best way to kill the Shootout would be to
> make things more complicated than they already are.

I think it would be simpler.

-- 
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
Objective CAML for Scientists
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists