[Utnubu-discuss] Utnubu superfluous? Re: [Utnubu-svn-commits] r143 - in /report-scripts: doitall.sh scottwatcher/

[Raphael Hertzog]

Hi,

On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> On 7/19/06, Joachim Breitner <nomeata at debian.org> wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >scottwatcher was just rightly disabled (I was planing to do that, but
> >didn't get around. thanks stratus). I now pose the qustion if the Utnubu
> >team shoud dissolve?

I don't think so. 

I agree that Utnubu is more or less a dormant/dead team. However it does
show that some Debian developers care about the work done by Ubuntu and
give them an umbrella for their work.

Even if the team is only here to justify isolated actions done without
coordination, it's still good to have.

> >But what's your opinion? Utnubu does no harm, so we might as well
> >continue to do as we do now. Or maybe someone wants to step up and push
> >things a bit, take a bit of a lead?
> 
> I would like to do this, but if buxy has some free time (i doubt he
> has, but...) i think he will do better than me. I can help anyway.

Having a leader would be great, definitely. But no, I don't have time for
that. I'm trying to push things forward with my limited time... and
currently my approach is to develop new infrastructure to collaborate on a
new scale with the help of many more people (cf wotomae/DWTT:
http://wiki.debian.org/DWTT) and I expect Utnubu to be one of the first
user.

So, I suggest to continue even if the team is not a usual team.

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog

Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux :
http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/