[Debian-arabic-packages] The future of aspell-ar package
msameer at foolab.org
Sat Oct 7 16:38:51 UTC 2006
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 05:51:58PM +0200, Lior Kaplan wrote:
> Mohammed Sameer wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 01:34:08PM +0200, Lior Kaplan wrote:
> >> Mohammed Sameer wrote:
> >>>> I think we should do a -2 package any way. Mohammed - can you send me
> >>>> the changes you've done, so I could import the source package and the
> >>>> change to the svn?
> >>> Here's the diff for -2
> >>> http://home.foolab.org/debs/aspell-ar/20060329/2/aspell-ar_0.0.20060329-2.diff.gz
> >>> And the whole thing is here:
> >>> http://home.foolab.org/debs/aspell-ar/20060329/2/
> >> Saw the changes. Why did you remove the *.alias files ?
> > Because the package doesn't contain any .alias files
> > dh_install now complains (dh_install: aspell-ar missing files (*.alias), aborting)
> > because of the compatibility level we are using (5).
> The contents of the .alias file is very simple.
Yes I know but do we really need an alias file ?
PS. I'm trying to understand our SVN structure but I'm a bit confused.
trunk: is what we base the deb on ?
branches/upstream/current: is the current upstream ?
But how do keep current pointing to the latest ?
And how do we use all this to build debs ?
Another stupid question: Why do we keep upstream ?
Sorry for such question but I didn't join a team before.
GNU/Linux registered user #224950
Proud Egyptian GNU/Linux User Group <www.eglug.org> Member.
Life powered by Debian, Homepage: www.foolab.org
Don't send me any attachment in Micro$oft (.DOC, .PPT) format please
Preferable attachments: .PDF, .HTML, .TXT
Thanx for adding this text to Your signature
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-arabic-packages/attachments/20061007/afcb73fd/attachment.pgp
More information about the Debian-arabic-packages