[debpool] Does it make sense to convert to debpool now?

Marc Haber mh+debpool-devel at zugschlus.de
Tue Apr 17 14:21:02 UTC 2007


On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 03:06:24PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> One question though: Does it happen that you have only some of the binary 
> packages from a certain source package in a certain distribution? Otherwise 
> it seems rather redundant (although I guess it could be how your program 
> knows what records to include in the Packages files.

It has happened in the past in the sarge era, yes, IIRC with
libcomerr-dev since I needed that for a backport but didn't want to
update the ext2fsutils themselves on productive systems.

Greetings
Marc

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber         | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany  |  lose things."    Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Nordisch by Nature |  How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 3221 2323190



More information about the Debpool-devel mailing list