The haunting role::software:{application, utility} distinction
Benjamin Mesing
bensmail at gmx.net
Fri Dec 16 22:47:28 UTC 2005
Hello,
I have discovered, that people tagging their application still are not
doing well on agreeing on a common definition of the application and
utility tags.
Examples I was able to find in a short period of time, where I would
judge the packages similiar in their complexity, but tagged differently:
xterm: utitility
konsole: utility
gnome-terminal: application
synaptic: application
kpackage: utility
nano: utility
joe: application
debtags: application
debtags-edit: application
packagesearch: utility
gimageview: utility
gqview: application
Of course there are applications where the distinction is easy - Gimp,
OpenOffice, Konqueror, emacs etc.
Though it seems harder to find programs which are definetely tools --
mixer programs, xview,... come to my mind.
Still there is a large undefined area in between, and I doubt that we
are actually gaining value with such a fuzzy distinction.
If you think that we should keep up this distinction, do you have any
ideas how to avoid contradictions like those shown above? Could it help
to add a number of examples into the tagging hints section?
Best regards
Ben
More information about the Debtags-devel
mailing list