[Debtags-devel] use::development
Enrico Zini
enrico at enricozini.org
Sat Sep 10 12:51:37 UTC 2005
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 11:59:09AM +0100, Justin B Rye wrote:
> Peter Rockai (mornfall) wrote:
> > Hi, any reason against this tag? Anyone else would find it useful?
> The devel:: facet is already effectively a use::devel: subsystem, so
> a generic use::development would be somewhat redundant... unless
> perhaps there were a lot of unclassifiable misc-devel packages
> without appropriate devel:: tags. In that case they'd be candidates
> for a use::development tag; if they exist, I'm not recognising them,
> but that's perfectly possible.
But when one looks inside 'use', the facet does not have a 'developing'
tag, while that is indeed one of the main activities people do with
Debian. I wouldn't mind adding it, for completeness sake. Then maybe
later on we can decide to graft the devel:: tags inside use::developing.
So, uhm, I'd be in favour of adding use::developing actually.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <enrico at enricozini.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debtags-devel/attachments/20050910/677d4c95/attachment.pgp
More information about the Debtags-devel
mailing list