Re: "Ta page est nulle parce qu'elle est pas compatible avec mon browser programmé en 1870"

Wed Dec 2 20:42:19 UTC 2009

I am agree and I'm agree and I'm agree with you Pierre-Alexandre

M. Farzad Sehat
farzad.sehat at gmail.com

Le 2 décembre 2009 21:27, Pierre-Alexandre Voye <ontologiae at gmail.com> a
écrit :

> I'm agree with Farzad : this site is not disturbing according to 2009's web
> standard.
> Javascript is now and more and more a natural part of a webpage, I don't
> undertand why some dinosaurs want to continue to avoid it, or others thing
> like prefering lynx to a normal browser.
>
> I'm agree on
> -  We don't need logo scrolling
>
> about your position, I propose you to read that :
> http://www.tsgk.net/cowboyz/ddr.html
> And particularly the section *"LES LINUXIENS"*
>
> 2009/12/2 Mildred Ki'Lya <ml.mildred593 at gmail.com>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> (WARNING: don't be put off by these remarks. I'm not saying the website
>> is bad, just that it could be improved)
>>
>> I did not took part in the conversation about the wallpaper but I think
>> there is a point here, that I feel from some time about the Lisaac
>> website. To put it simply, I think there is too much Javascript in that
>> website, and it is too much animated.
>>
>>
>>
>> First, I think Javascript should NOT be required for the Lisaac website.
>> Why ?
>>
>> Because some people (like me) don't allow JavaScript globally and only
>> allow websites from a whitelist. The main advantage of doing so is that
>> you get away from most of the advertisement and nasty things found on
>> modern webpages.
>>
>> I don't say not to use Javascript, just not make it mandatory for the
>> website.
>>
>>
>>
>> Now, if I do enable Javascript, I find the front page too much animated.
>> All those effects are nice but get in the way of the user in the end.
>> And it also from my point of view it gives a childish appearance to the
>> website. It makes me remember of all those website that included too
>> much JavaScript (back when JavaScript was a novelty).
>>
>> What I think should be removed:
>>
>> - The logos scrolling. You really don't care about them most of the time
>> and it draw your eyes to this area.
>>
>> - The animation on the menus is pretty disturbing to me. i much more
>> prefer to have the menu popping open. And with the animation, it makes
>> me wonder if my computer is slow when I focus on "Downloads" since it
>> doesn't have a menu. Again, it draw your eyes to the expanding corner of
>> the menu where there is nothing interesting instead of the content of
>> the menu. So, for a millisecond, you are busy trying to focus on a
>> moving menu.
>>
>> - About the fading news on the front page. This is not as much of a
>> problem as the two points I mentioned above. But without Javascript,
>> it's like mess. I think it would be much better to create a bullet point
>> list allowing the user to see what happened. Fading news are nice but
>> you don't know which is first, which is last. And you end up not reading
>> them at all. Also, when yyou click on an arrow to show the next/previous
>> news, you have to wait for the news to appear, and the impatient visitor
>> won't wait for that long. And, is that normal the news always end with
>> "..."?
>>
>> - In comunity -> Team, I don't think we should have a fancy view at all.
>> Especially if it plays sound (that's annoying) and especially if it's
>> the only way to access more detailled information about team members
>> (photo, CV, ...). Again, this doesn't help with the professional image
>> of the website.
>>
>>
>> Now, other things:
>>
>> - The poll, is that really useful? I don't say it's not, but...
>> - Why cares how many people are visiting the website? This is not a
>> comunity website (like a forum) where we might want to out friends online.
>> - If you ask me, the second wallpaper shouldn't be on the official
>> website. I understand why guys might like it, but please, not here. Your
>> personal website is fine for that.
>> - Documentation -> Library. There should be a note to tell people
>> they're not going to stay on the website. They don't except to be thrown
>> directly in the library browser.
>> - The top of the webpage says "The power of simplicity at work for you".
>> The reflection is a bit too much I think and doesn't help reading the
>> text. Perhaps it could be softened.
>>
>>
>>
>> Now, i do realize this email might sound like a lot of critics, and
>> please excuse me for that. This website is a wonderful initiative (even
>> if I do prefer on a personal level static webpages generated
>> automatically). I don't say it's not good. I just say it can be
>> improved, and hopefully my remarks are constructive.
>>
>>
>> If I should ask for a feature in that website, I would ask for the
>> ability to add pages using a markdown syntax (or similar, I don't really
>> care). Preferably, without having to use a web interface (I just hate
>> web interface). I do prefer plain old protocols like ssh or rsync.
>>
>> Mildred
>>
>> --
>> Mildred Ki'Lya
>> ╭───────── ｍｉｌｄｒｅｄ５９３＠ｏｎｌｉｎｅ．ｆｒ ──────────
>> │ Jabber, GoogleTalk: <mildred at jabber.fr>
>> │ Website: <http://ki.lya.online.fr>           GPG ID: 9A7D 2E2B
>> │ Fingerprint: 197C A7E6 645B 4299 6D37 684B 6F9D A8D6 9A7D 2E2B
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lisaac-devel mailing list
>> Lisaac-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
>> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/lisaac-devel
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> ---------------------
> Isaac Project - http://www.lisaac.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lisaac-devel mailing list
> Lisaac-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/lisaac-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/lisaac-devel/attachments/20091202/378caeb1/attachment-0001.htm>