[Logcheck-devel] Has server/kernel taken over workstation/kernel?

martin f krafft madduck at debian.org
Sat Jul 18 11:33:48 UTC 2009


also sprach Frédéric Brière <fbriere at fbriere.net> [2009.07.18.1322 +0200]:
> Indeed, it wasn't.  What I'm saying is that every rule in workstation
> was *copied* into server, which doesn't make a lot of sense.  Now you've
> got 130+ sets of duplicate rules, which are not identical to boot, since
> some changes were applied to server but not to workstation.

I definitely didn't want that, nor do I think I did that. I copied
violations.ignore.d/logcheck-kernel to ignore.d.server/kernel, and
due to the nature of how violations and normal filters interacted,
violations.ignore.d had a lot of duplications.

> Did you truly mean to copy those rules?  I don't mind giving you
> a hand in rooting them out, but we'd have to agree on the problem
> first.

I think any such time would be better invested in implementing
template support; without that, any strive to remove redundancy
would just be silly, I think. Hint hint. :)

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck at d.o>      Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer               http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck    http://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
"nothing can cure the soul but the senses,
 just as nothing can cure the senses but the soul."
                                                        -- oscar wilde
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20090718/39307950/attachment-0001.pgp>


More information about the Logcheck-devel mailing list