[Logcheck-devel] Has server/kernel taken over workstation/kernel?
martin f krafft
madduck at debian.org
Sat Jul 18 11:33:48 UTC 2009
also sprach Frédéric Brière <fbriere at fbriere.net> [2009.07.18.1322 +0200]:
> Indeed, it wasn't. What I'm saying is that every rule in workstation
> was *copied* into server, which doesn't make a lot of sense. Now you've
> got 130+ sets of duplicate rules, which are not identical to boot, since
> some changes were applied to server but not to workstation.
I definitely didn't want that, nor do I think I did that. I copied
violations.ignore.d/logcheck-kernel to ignore.d.server/kernel, and
due to the nature of how violations and normal filters interacted,
violations.ignore.d had a lot of duplications.
> Did you truly mean to copy those rules? I don't mind giving you
> a hand in rooting them out, but we'd have to agree on the problem
> first.
I think any such time would be better invested in implementing
template support; without that, any strive to remove redundancy
would just be silly, I think. Hint hint. :)
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck at d.o> Related projects:
: :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://vcs-pkg.org
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
"nothing can cure the soul but the senses,
just as nothing can cure the senses but the soul."
-- oscar wilde
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20090718/39307950/attachment-0001.pgp>
More information about the Logcheck-devel
mailing list