licence (was: What's going on with the Packaging Handbook project)

[Davide Truffa]

martin wrote:

> Anyway, I am not the one to decide this and I will help out
> independently of the licence.
Yeah, but we have to choose a license; and do it all together (if
possible).

> But I would like to ask Davide to provide — just for the record
> — his reasons for choice of GPL2/3 vs. the CC nc-by-sa 2.5 or 3.0
> licence.
For the simple reason that the documents we have, nm-guide or developer-reference for example, are distributed under GPL (2 or later).
The use of CC nc-by-sa (2.5 or 3.0) is equivalent to re-license them.


-- 
Davide Truffa
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/packaging-handbook-project/attachments/20070905/7b81b3c9/attachment.pgp