Sarge Backport

[Sven Mueller]

Benjamin Seidenberg wrote on 09/03/2006 21:31:
> Well, now that we're in testing (hu-rah!), we are eligible to have cyrus 
> 2.2 hosted on backports.org. I talked to nobse earlier, and he said 
> there shouldn't be a problem with it. Henrique: you're apparently 
> already in the key, so if we decide to go ahead and upload, can you do 
> that for us?
> Everyone else: Should we upload to backports.org? I see no reason not 
> to, and it's very obvious why we should, so I vote yes.

I second the proposal. Actually that's one of the reasons for the sarge
branch in the SVN. That branch recent relative to /trunk, so if we want
to upload the backport to backports.org, we might need to also do an
upload to sid. Seeing how small the differences are, however, I would
not mind uploading the sarge branch as-is.

cu,
sven
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-cyrus-imapd-debian-devel/attachments/20060309/385db17a/signature.pgp