Sarge Backport

[Henrique de Moraes Holschuh]

On Thu, 09 Mar 2006, Sven Mueller wrote:
> Benjamin Seidenberg wrote on 09/03/2006 21:31:
> > Well, now that we're in testing (hu-rah!), we are eligible to have cyrus 
> > 2.2 hosted on backports.org. I talked to nobse earlier, and he said 
> > there shouldn't be a problem with it. Henrique: you're apparently 
> > already in the key, so if we decide to go ahead and upload, can you do 
> > that for us?
> > Everyone else: Should we upload to backports.org? I see no reason not 
> > to, and it's very obvious why we should, so I vote yes.
> 
> I second the proposal. Actually that's one of the reasons for the sarge
> branch in the SVN. That branch recent relative to /trunk, so if we want
> to upload the backport to backports.org, we might need to also do an
> upload to sid. Seeing how small the differences are, however, I would
> not mind uploading the sarge branch as-is.

Please keep it in sync with sid, and note in the backports changelog which
Sid version it is based on.  This kind of simple book-keeping can help us
later on.  Even if the bpo requirements for version naming carries that
information indirectly, it helps to avoid mistakes.

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh