Sarge Backport

[Benjamin Seidenberg]

Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:

>On Thu, 09 Mar 2006, Sven Mueller wrote:
>  
>
>>Benjamin Seidenberg wrote on 09/03/2006 21:31:
>>    
>>
>>>Well, now that we're in testing (hu-rah!), we are eligible to have cyrus 
>>>2.2 hosted on backports.org. I talked to nobse earlier, and he said 
>>>there shouldn't be a problem with it. Henrique: you're apparently 
>>>already in the key, so if we decide to go ahead and upload, can you do 
>>>that for us?
>>>Everyone else: Should we upload to backports.org? I see no reason not 
>>>to, and it's very obvious why we should, so I vote yes.
>>>      
>>>
>>I second the proposal. Actually that's one of the reasons for the sarge
>>branch in the SVN. That branch recent relative to /trunk, so if we want
>>to upload the backport to backports.org, we might need to also do an
>>upload to sid. Seeing how small the differences are, however, I would
>>not mind uploading the sarge branch as-is.
>>    
>>
>
>Please keep it in sync with sid, and note in the backports changelog which
>Sid version it is based on.  This kind of simple book-keeping can help us
>later on.  Even if the bpo requirements for version naming carries that
>information indirectly, it helps to avoid mistakes.
>
>  
>
We just have to do the uploads simultaniously. Once we vote on this, if 
it passes, whoever uploads to sid should upload to backports.org at the 
same time.

Benjamin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 256 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-cyrus-imapd-debian-devel/attachments/20060310/47767197/signature.pgp