[Pkg-gnupg-commit] r23 - /gnupg/branches/experimental/debian/TODO

dleidert-guest at users.alioth.debian.org dleidert-guest at users.alioth.debian.org
Sat May 24 22:16:31 UTC 2008


Author: dleidert-guest
Date: Sat May 24 22:16:30 2008
New Revision: 23

URL: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-gnupg/?sc=1&rev=23
Log:
More stuff examined. Please comment.


Modified:
    gnupg/branches/experimental/debian/TODO

Modified: gnupg/branches/experimental/debian/TODO
URL: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-gnupg/gnupg/branches/experimental/debian/TODO?rev=23&op=diff
==============================================================================
--- gnupg/branches/experimental/debian/TODO (original)
+++ gnupg/branches/experimental/debian/TODO Sat May 24 22:16:30 2008
@@ -4,9 +4,11 @@
   braces the upstream tracker item number):
   
   #72148 : will deadlock with no timeout if keyserver cannot close socket (#151)
+  #113897: "Oops: lock already hold by us" when using --fast-import (not 100% sure)
   #137381: http_proxy support (#361)
   #146345: gnupg: Can't restrict access to secring.gpg (--enable-selinux-support)
   #183463: gnupg: when sending large keyrings to server, should send in many small pieces (#120)
+  #194292: gnupg: breaks apt-check-sigs by only checking the first signature (g10/ChangeLog)
 
   the following I'm not 100% sure:
   #166794,
@@ -24,8 +26,6 @@
   debian/patches/60_install_options_skel.dpatch: fixed-upstream in 1.4.7
   debian/patches/61_use_agent_default.dpatch: we should decide if used as default
 
-* check for ldap to be put in recommends (#399167)
-
 * discuss
 
   - libcurl4-gnutls-dev build-dependency - seems to fix several issues
@@ -37,6 +37,9 @@
 
   - if build still fails on ppc64 (#343434)
 
+  - if the libldap dependency can be downgraded to a recommended package (I'm
+    currently not in favour of this - #399167)
+
 * check for compliance with version 3.7.3 of the policy!
 general:
 
@@ -46,6 +49,8 @@
 
 * Close candidate (upstream rejected change):
 
+ #38857: gnupg: no way to copy a key
+ #61914: gnupg: confusing question in gpg key generation process (I cannot agree)
  #93656: gnupg; No way to specify multiple keyservers? (#139)
 #162742: gnupg: Please handle "deprecated option honor-http-proxy"
 #173586: gnupg: Suggestion for a better error message




More information about the Pkg-gnupg-commit mailing list