bug 266981

[Jörg Sommer]

--bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Rafael Laboissiere schrieb am Sun 01. May, 18:41 (+0200) :
> * J=F6rg Sommer <joerg@alea.gnuu.de> [2005-05-01 16:54]:
>=20
> > what to do with #266981? It discribes that 00site.sl and 99defaults.sl
> > aren't removed from /etc/jed-init.d/. But in the woody and unstable
> > version these files aren't in the package. Maybe there where problems on
> > the system of the bug report submitter while updating to the version
> > without 00site.sl and 99defaults.sl
>=20
> I think that these files existed at some point in testing.  People who
> installed the version of the jed-common package that contained them have =
the
> files left in the system after the upgrade.

But we can't remove the files, because a user may have made changes in it
and we would remove its private config.

How deal other packages with such problems. I think the special here is
/etc

J=F6rg.

--=20
=BBPerl - the only language that looks the same
 before and after RSA encryption.=AB           -- Keith Bostic

--bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iQEVAwUBQnaXzoZ13Cz2nwVYAQLDBggAsGPBrAJeVHmhn4WcdoY76mLOll+Cb1Ai
Y0E8Q29DOaw9w+vwdlnIjEd4wAC5Pnzqnkv9JH8vTgKqvLGTOEeonPDaN0k8jJCR
hiIxYyVV23j3eZBxK5r2k3WpVfsA32hxqTqGstTSawFbGtw2K2tWY2fYy4xERlKT
9kQH+4VSEE8+/eOYAiGhX/NF2mRazkOWmZaWTPJvi5s4JZ3Dy7xVR8HTakj/SdIH
S/zv6Hklxk69LjS1WxaP8zmP2QGyJmr7zGWn+krwVLXfnK0LRF36pt7Chz5gWQd+
TPj+aSNhMPjasZB+4tvrnuFch6Jzplkq7vCEQ9bcppT6mZeaoBCT9Q==
=OueG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5--