New SVN Release

G. Milde g.milde at
Wed Sep 21 06:56:38 UTC 2005

On 20.09.05, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * Jörg Sommer <joerg at> [2005-09-20 14:35]:
> > But this version breaks jed-extra.  We should conflict on it
> I made jed-common conflict with jed-extra <= 1.0-1.  This is the
> version currently in experimental.  Will this be enough?

Yes indeed. It would be very ugly if this were an "eternal" conflict.

Maybe we can add a line about this in the changelog too, e.g.

   Conflicts with jed-extra <= 1.0-1, because we are now using SLang2.
   (Get SLang2-compatible extra modes from

> > And the changelog entry needs a review.
> Done.  Please, review my changes.

I had a ispell run on it and found some more typos.
> I think we should address this Lintian warning:
>     W: jed source: not-using-po-debconf

Does this mean we should provide internationalization support for debconf
(As JED is English-only, I would not take this as urgent.)?

> From John's post in jed-users about the 0.99-18 release, I guess that
> there will be no final 0.99-17.  In this case, we should change the
> number of the package to simply before releasing it.
> What do you think?

Please change it. And add Johns explanation about odd numbers beeing
developer's releases and even numbers stable.

Thanks for your efforts



More information about the Pkg-jed-devel mailing list