New SVN Release
g.milde at web.de
Wed Sep 21 06:56:38 UTC 2005
On 20.09.05, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * Jörg Sommer <joerg at alea.gnuu.de> [2005-09-20 14:35]:
> > But this version breaks jed-extra. We should conflict on it
> I made jed-common conflict with jed-extra <= 1.0-1. This is the
> version currently in experimental. Will this be enough?
Yes indeed. It would be very ugly if this were an "eternal" conflict.
Maybe we can add a line about this in the changelog too, e.g.
Conflicts with jed-extra <= 1.0-1, because we are now using SLang2.
(Get SLang2-compatible extra modes from http://jedmodes.sf.net/)
> > And the changelog entry needs a review.
> Done. Please, review my changes.
I had a ispell run on it and found some more typos.
> I think we should address this Lintian warning:
> W: jed source: not-using-po-debconf
Does this mean we should provide internationalization support for debconf
(As JED is English-only, I would not take this as urgent.)?
> From John's post in jed-users about the 0.99-18 release, I guess that
> there will be no final 0.99-17. In this case, we should change the
> number of the package to simply 0.99.17.111-1 before releasing it.
> What do you think?
Please change it. And add Johns explanation about odd numbers beeing
developer's releases and even numbers stable.
Thanks for your efforts
More information about the Pkg-jed-devel