[php-maint] php license in pear modules

sean finney seanius at seanius.net
Thu Feb 15 16:13:04 UTC 2007

hey martin,

On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 18:00 +0100, Martin Lohmeier wrote:
> I've started to adopt the pear packages that were up for adoption and
> started some maintenance for for pear packages who already were in svn.
> (in the end :-) )

yes, i saw all the svn traffic, great to hear someone's picking up the
slack with these :)

> With php-db I noticed that there's a license problem. My question now is:
> Should I first fix this license problem, and we ask the release manager
> to include this changes into etch? For php-db (and probably other
> packages to) there is a new upstream version available, but is should
> probably not be included into etch.

what exactly is the license problem?  is it that the specific pear
module is php licensed?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-php-maint/attachments/20070215/fca594f3/attachment.pgp

More information about the pkg-php-maint mailing list