[Shootout-list] Weekly Update

[Isaac Gouy]

> it would actually be a good thing (tm) to only allow object oriented 
> languages in these 2 tests.

And set the weight for those tests in CRAPS to zero.

> but what about scheme? i agree that ''objects are a poor mans
closures''
> and would definitly allow scheme.

A naive approach would be to take the claims of the language designers
at face value. If they claim the language is OO then believe them.

Scheme - if it was an OO language why would anyone need an
object-oriented extension to the programming language Scheme?
"Schematic: A Concurrent Object-Oriented Extension to Scheme"


		
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com