[Shootout-list] A few unrelated points, remove hash test

[Bengt Kleberg]

Brent Fulgham wrote:
...deleted
> What would you prefer we call it?  Number->String conversion?  I'd 
> rather change
> the name than remove the test completely...

this is what i get from beeing reasonable. next time i will stand by my 
principles and avoid this kind of difficult decisions :-)

since we already have a hash test (hash2, unless it too is plagued by 
these kind of problems) it seems ok to remove hash.

if we want to keep it (why?), it should be called something else. i am 
at a loss to find a nice name for a test that does two unrelated things. 
admitedly i have made the same mistake when i tried to do a message 
passing test. it involves creating processes. but i am unaware of a way 
to avoid the process creation.

in this case we know how to avoid both the number->string, and the hash 
part of this test. split in two, i say ;-)
one hash test (which probably would look very much like hash2) and one 
number->string test. ok?


bengt