[Shootout-list] Re: haskell lists

[Aaron Denney]

On 2004-09-30, Brent Fulgham <bfulgham@debian.org> wrote:
> On 2004-09-29 10:18:15 -0700 Aaron Denney <wnoise@ofb.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi.  I've noticed that the list processing benchmark for Haskell is
>> listed as "Test Implemented but not measured (timeout or error)."
>> 
>> It's also ridiculously inefficient.  I've attached a much faster
>> implementation that relies on the "Edison" libraries that come with
>> GHC to use lists that can be efficiently manipulated at either end.
>> 
>
> Any idea why it believes the correct answer is '4' (for N=4), rather 
> than
> the expected 10000?

Thinko confusing SIZE with N.  Someone just posted a corrected version.

-- 
Aaron Denney
-><-