[Tahoe-debian] package review

[bertagaz at ptitcanardnoir.org]

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 03:06:08PM -0400, micah anderson wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 00:14:17 +0200, bertagaz at ptitcanardnoir.org wrote:
> > Nop, even google don't think it exists. Is it something that might block
> > the package upload? We should consider sending one upload anyway but I was
> > hoping it could be delayed for another later upload.
> 
> No, it doens't block it. Every binary is supposed to have a man page, we
> can easily generate one with help2man and then clean it up, but it
> should not block us.

Didn't know help2man, seems to produce quite a rough manpage but will
see if I can get it into a good shape from that. Thanks for the tip :)

> > > Lintian also complained about this:
> > > 
> > > W: tahoe-lafs source: dh-clean-k-is-deprecated
> > > 
> > > Info: This package calls dh_clean -k in its <tt>debian/rules</tt> file
> > >  and declares a debhelper compatibility version of at least 7.
> > >  .
> > >  debhelper 7 deprecated dh_clean -k in favour of dh_prep.
> > > 
> > > The dh_clean -k is in the install target in debian/rules, replacing with
> > > dh_prep seems to be fine
> > 
> > Last time I checked lintian was only complaining about the missing
> > manpage, but I might have forgotten to run it against the last package
> > version where I did bump the debhelper compatibility.
> 
> I ran lintian on sid, don't know if you did as well, or if this was a
> new lintian issue that has appeared since your last run.

I think I tested it with a lintian from squeeze, might be the reason why.

> At least it is not CVS...

Sure I shouldn't complain ;)

> Let me know about zfec, and I can review/sponsor that too.

Great, I'll bug you once more.

Bert.